In the context of the United States today, gun ownership – especially of semi automatics – is quite controversial. Supporters of the Second Amendment often argue that access to these firearms is essential for personal protection and a constitutional right that should not be compromised. Conversely, many see semi automatics as a public safety threat (given their use in numerous mass shootings), arguing that they differ from standard handguns due to their rapid-fire capabilities and ability to hold larger magazines.
Following the Highland Park shooting (a July 4, 2022 parade with seven dead and 48 injured), Illinois prohibited AR-15-style rifles, high-capacity magazines, and specific firearm attachments, hoping to enhance public safety. However, a federal judge has recently overturned the ban, arguing it conflicts with Second Amendment protections and lacks historical precedent, though state officials have appealed.
Many supporters of this action argue that public safety should not come at the expense of fundamental rights. This aligns with Second Amendment protections and avoids setting a precedent that could restrict access to widely owned firearms for future decisions. However, opponents fear that communities may be more vulnerable to mass shootings. Citing the Highland Park Shooting, opponents feel the need for the ban to maintain.
A potential public policy that could balance these concerns is developing a tiered system for weapon ownership. Everyone can be granted weapons that are considered at the lower “tier,” such as a hand pistol. However, higher-risk firearms like semi automatic rifles require additional scrutiny, training, and periodic re-evaluation of the owner’s qualifications.
Regardless of the policy, situations like these demand response, as there are many consequences that could rise. Other states may face challenges in enacting similar firearm restrictions, potentially increasing public access to semiautomatic weapons. Additionally, this could lead to heightened legal battles over gun control measures and may impact the federal approach to Second Amendment interpretations.